AUSTRALIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM

Lisa Developments Pty. Limited, Australia, (Artificial Intelligence -> Mind Network, 
Applied Neuroscience, Computer Software) Telephone Number (Australia) 015922245 
ACN 003826659 Background 1996. 

Australian population is about 50% of non Anglo-Saxon 
heritage - it takes about 2 generations of natural born children of European or 
Asian ancestry to feel as one with a new nation, with a new culture - these generations 
are now nearly there but they are not taking to the Anglo-Saxon Australians and 
that is a concern - because with a 50% mix of Anglo-Saxons and non Anglo-Saxons 
no one can afford to ignore the fact that something is not right, for the sake 
of your children if you are clever or intelligent or well educated, you can not 
afford to ignore. In this brief report, let us tear away at the root of what could 
well be the main problem of creating a new nation - the Australian Justice System.
 
If you are a Roman Catholic then perhaps you can appreciate the 'holiness' placed 
on the Pope, but alas, the British Queen is head of the Anglican Church and as 
you read this, consider the awesome problem of altering Anglo-Saxon law, I don't 
call it Australian Law, it is Anglo-Saxon - what Australian would wear a wig to 
sit as a judge on the Superior Courts? It is medieval type legal structure, totally 
alien to most Australians, that we have in place in our country and it is semi-enshrined 
with the office of a head of a church. Of course, to eradicate racism takes a 
long time. Look carefully into any of the major public service departments and 
you can find strange things that might well be racism, consider - the NSW Education 
department allows schools to only give out a certain number of "A" grades per 
school regardless of how many students are eligible. Puzzling? Appears that way 
but think carefully now, which sub-cultural group has proven to be the most successful 
academically? Australians of Asian origin have and the obvious question has to 
be asked - when two students score equal top marks and one is an Australian of 
Asian background and the other of an Anglo-Saxon background, who makes the decision 
who gets the A and who gets the B, given a particular school is only allocated 
one single A grade that it can give out? While common sense and sound policies 
can eradicate matters such as the above there are other areas and policies and 
way of doing things that can not be changed readily. Understanding the Anglo-Saxon 
legal system may hold the golden key to grasping the problems of a new multi-cultural 
Australia.

If you are of non Anglo-Saxon origin chances are you will never get 
jury duty; if you suffer injury at work the odds are that the Anglo-Saxon juries 
will award you less in damages if you are not from Anglo-Saxon stock - this is 
the naked TRUTH about the Australian legal system and any good barrister knows 
this. The Anglo-Saxon judges - (note that the Supreme and High Courts were not 
the subject of research) - appear to seldom use common sense in matters of justice 
- they don't know 'justice', they just know 'law' and usually only their own esoteric 
'interpretation of law' and this in some 'holy way' mysterious to anyone who is 
not Anglican. At University they are not taught to "think" per se - but to use 
a style of reasoning which is unique to the Anglo-Saxons. Whether you are an Australian 
of Anglo-Saxon ancestry or of Italian ancestry or of Russian ancestry, or Asian, 
or whatever (or British - a person who may have immigrated as a child to Australia 
is unlikely in adult life to view themselves as Australian, they will see themselves 
as British, and this too is important to appreciate in perspective), it is essential 
to correctly understand those aspects of present day Australia which no longer 
fit into our society. No punches can be held back, when addressing aspects of 
the system which are not proper, because the human instinct will know when you 
are trying to 'pretend' that something is not really a problem. In other words, 
truth alone and correct interpretation of aspects of Australian law is the only 
proper way to begin forging a new nation. Let us begin. Let us examine what might 
well be a typical situation in an Australian court of law. I once came upon a 
senior member of the Administrative Appeal Tribunal (AAT), a Dr Grimes, who in 
1993 was at the Parramatta Chambers of the AAT. Now, I am a neuroscientist (from 
a computing background but this matters little, my personal research into neuroscience 
appears to be attaining recognition from diverse world-wide sectors) and the fact 
that I know the human brain backwards means that sometimes I can study a person's 
facial expression and know some aspects of their thoughts. When I saw Dr Grimes 
for the first time one thing struck me immediately, "a natural racist". 

While I am a neuroscientist and pick such things up using qualified knowledge - the 
reality is that non-neuroscientists can pick such things up using their instinct. 
For this reason it should be a part of a new Australian constitution that no one 
gets to be on any tribunal or be a judge of any kind if they can not pass a basic 
psychological 'racist level' test (on which most of us would scrore positive - 
to some degree we are all racists but not 'blind racists' - but clearly there 
is a human positive level which is tolerable and there is a very vicious level.) 

50% of Legal Occupational Group Affected with a Mental Dysfunction (A neuroscientific 
report can be put together. Cost would be negotiated.) Our Artificial Intelligence, 
after studying about one hundred legal judgements and using input from special 
research, has found that 50% of Australian legal occupational group showed symptoms 
of a severe mental dysfunction. A mental dysfunction is an inability of the brain 
to work together as a unity. The reason is not just the tactic of 'ridicule' which 
an unscrupulous barrister may use to win a case, its not their desire to twist 
reality to conform to their view - all these things can add up and cause the brain 
to become dysfunctional - but what was observed was an actual neurosis (the brain 
incapable of operating in the mode it is operating and as a consequence parts 
enter a shock state and functional structures break down and twist and 'weld together'). 

A brief summary of this report was placed by the Australian Medical Association 
on their files in 1994. Australia has a problem on its hands - an enormous problem 
- a problem those not qualified in medicine or neuroscience may not grasp and 
that makes this a tragedy. Medically (meaning science of the brain) the problem 
appears as an imbalance between the left and right cerebral hemisphere, an imbalance 
to the point at which a solicitor may sound like a University professor but has 
no comprehension what they are conveying. The energy resulting from the mode in 
which the brain thus operates causes the frontal brain's "amusement, entertainment, 
and ridicule" areas to create pathetic thought patterns during serious hearings. 

(Something along the same line can happen to the very old who for example may 
burst out laughing at a funeral, and later very distressed and upset they go to 
their doctor asking why they laughed. The reason is a dysfunctional brain response 
- when the brain can no longer correctly route certain energy flowing across it, 
grief can become laughter - and similarly in the mentally dysfunctional barrister 
and judge common sense and logic and reason and the natural feeling for truth 
and intelligence may become ridicule and twisting of facts to fit into a dysfunctional 
frame-of-mind.) Interest point: Out of curiousity, I once contacted a number of 
legal bodies asking about the procedure to remove from the bench a mentally ill 
judge. Apparently there is no way. Mental illness is like any other disorder and 
can happen to anyone - but alas those who wrote the Australian-Anglo-Saxon constitution 
never understood such things, to the men of old the Anglo-Saxon judges were servants 
of the Queen and infallible, and to make certain this was always so they defined 
their own medical definition of 'insanity' - fascinating!!!!!! That's like asking 
Jack the Ripper what proper surgical procedures are! Interest point: SOLICITORS 
speak the language of "law" - the Anglo-Saxon legal system in our country has 
no ability to understand "English" per se, it understands almost every English 
word as defined by legal precedents. You look up in the dictionary to see what 
a word means, the legal culture looks up what a word means in "legal precedents". 
I once spoke to a solicitor about a person who was accused of a particular offence 
and I replied, "he can't be guilty, what he said in this sentence says to me that 
he experienced paranoia and as a neuroscientist I know that a guilty person can 
not experience this type of paranoia." The solicitor was not interested - he was 
acting against the person in question - and was happy to admit that truth and 
facts are not really what Anglo-Saxon courts are very much about and the opposition 
did not have the funds to employ neuroscientists as expert witnesses to give evidence.

(Advice to you: if you are ever accused of anything you did not do, always but 
always ask for a lawyer because you being innocent is not a serious issue - no 
one wants to know truth per se - in an adversary legal system what matters is 
whether the opposition can persuade a judge that you could be guilty.) Any man 
or woman who spends ten years of their life trying to be 'objective' and 'impartial' 
as the legal profession tries, may damage the brain in some way (some damage being 
less serious than other damage). The human brain is not a machine and can not 
think in a way which does not use subjective reasoning because if it does over 
a long period the brain will damage itself and parts of the brain will begin to 
form tight magnetic fields which if not broken will turn parts of the brain into 
liquid and other parts into robot-like perceptions of life. Ask any University 
graduate over 30 years old what they think of lawyers and chances are they come 
back with, "stupid bloody things, its like talking to brick walls! Mental regression 
is what happens to them at University". Perhaps that's not far from truth - to 
learn law, you have to think how men a long time back thought (because you have 
to interpret law within the constitution and precedents) and that can be a silly 
thing to do, (on a continual basis), because it regresses. The British colonial 
legal system which is what Australia is for now stuck with is an "adversary" system 
- it is not about justice per se, it is not about truth or facts per se, it is 
about winning. The intention is 'winning' and only 'wininng' (sure, there are 
Law Reform Commissions about but they don't listen to you, they have no authority 
to listen to the people, they only listen to the Attorney Generals.) Interest 
point: Officers in the Attorney General's Department have been found mentally 
dysfunctional to the point of asking the Australian Federal Police to investigate 
a letter that explained it was medical research and explained what can happen 
to a person under pressure - the lawyer in question took it as a personal threat 
and insisted the AFP arrest the person who wrote the letter! AUSTRALIAN MUTUAL 
PROVIDENT SOCIETY (AMP) AMP is one of Australia's largest insurers. Does it take 
advantage of what appears as a largely dysfunctional (non thinking) legal system?

Or is there something more sinister involved - does AMP have judges on its payroll? 
After a careful examination of one case in particular our Artificial Intelligence(Fehler! 
Textmarke nicht definiert.) has left a question mark about this - you be the jury. 
A Mr Alan Thomas (not real name) owned a factory which caught fire. Mr Thomas 
was insured with AMP. AMP refused to pay, claiming Mr Thomas deliberately lit 
the fire. They persuaded a judge of this - but AMP failed to score a point with 
the police because had this been true, Mr Thomas would have to be charged with 
the criminal offense of arson. It could well be that in deciding whether to honour 
a contract, AMP takes into account if you can afford the costs of the High Court 
(and 99% of Australians are not in a position to do so) and if not they may reject 
your claim using their own techniques, such as accusing you of starting the fire. 

In the existing Anglo-Saxon legal system "truth" and "facts" are simply not that 
important - if you can persuade a judge about something valid or invalid that 
is perfectly tolerable. (Sure, it may depend on which manager in AMP refuses such 
claims, some might have a deeper motive.) Unless you are charged by police with 
arson, you are not guilty in law which is the only thing any barrister and judge 
can take legally into account - this judge in question either knows not law, which 
is unlikely, or else about the only plausible explanation assuming the man is 
not a complete idiot who believes anything, he is in fact on the payroll of AMP. 

Can you find a more intelligent explanation for this than what our Artificial 
Intelligence has? How has AMP changed since some years back when it was known 
as the best? Giant industries are about money and more money and if there is no 
more cows to be milked then one way to improve profits is to not to give the milk 
to those who have a natural right to it - it is possible that AMP's profits can 
no longer increase because the market is saturated and perhaps they have a new 
policy in place, a policy to avoid at all costs paying out large claims? AMP was 
asked about this. Their response was not reassuring. According to their head office 
they settle claims 'in a fair way' and have their own independent arbitrators. 

Now, this is the point at which our Artificial Intelligence 'halted' - why would 
you need to settle a claim in 'a fair way' when it is a question of a YES or NO? 
Why would you need your own arbitrators in a YES or NO situation? WESTPAC BANKING 
CORPORATION Banks can be dangerous in a democracy because of their wide "spheres 
of influence". Consider this case from our files. Mr J. Lee (not real name) resigned 
from WESTPAC and was conveyed the message that he will never find a job in his 
usual occupation. Let's study the case of Mr Lee. Mr Lee was in his early thirties 
when he resigned from WESTPAC and was a specialist in an area of, say, accounting. 

There are 200 companies in Australia who have the resources to need a specialist 
of this calibre and 80% of these use one particular accounting system which Mr 
Lee in fact helped to develop while working for the vendor of that accounting 
system. Mr Lee has excellent references (in writing) and his speciality is one 
for which the 200 large companies who use that particular accounting system are 
continually in need of top experts. But, 5 years down the track, and Mr Lee can't 
not find a position. Coincidence, unlucky, or was the conveyed threat of a senior 
WESTPAC manager serious. The conveyed threat was reported to a NSW Law Officer 
soon after it was made - just in case WESTPAC did have the muscle and arrogance 
to make a "boycott" come to pass. Now, most of you will think "Mr Lee should take 
this up with a solicitor". A sensible adult position. So we did, on Mr Lees' behalf, 
and in 1992 have written to perhaps every minister and legal body in the country 
(both labor and liberal MP's). Only one response from a politician who was not 
in a position to do anything about it - that's fair enough. Some members of the 
superior courts after being supplied with essential information came back with, 
"case exists, do consult a lawyer". So the NSW Law Society was asked to provide 
a list of specialist solicitors who could manage a case of this enormous scope. 

Two firms were suggested. Both contacted. Both had WESTPAC as client and would 
not act against WESTPAC. So - in theory the system is there, but in practice it 
appears not there. COMMONWEALTH EMPLOYMENT SERVICE - ANGLO SAXONS ONLY? How can 
it be possible for the CES not find a person with some of the most impressive 
references and experience in the country any work in the space of over 4 years? 
This should go into the guiness books of records - incompetency, or is it that 
the person in question has a foreign sounding name? According to our Artificial 
Intelligence the reason is "racism is the way of the Anglo-Saxon Public Service 
sub-culture." DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY - SABOTAGING COURT CASES Just before 
a hearing against a departmental decision, the DSS lawyers falsify and invent 
a claim that a person who is appealing owes the department over $20,000.

How much prejudice and bias against the appealant can a stunt like this introduce into 
a hearing? Clearly more than the average judge can bear because in one such instance 
the judge spent five minutes deliberating on a matter of such complexity it would 
take a qualified person months. We asked a solicitor what is the proper thing 
for a judge to do in this case. The solicitor replied that any claim of a debt 
has no relevance to the matter in question and should have been ignored - fair 
comment and oh how proper but what about human nature, human nature is not "that 
objective" and can not ignore an allegation of such scope. Further, to a mentally 
dyfunctional mind any decision in respect of "relationships" can throw such a 
state of mind into such an inner tumoil and anxiety - at a subconscious level 
- that they will completely ignore anything presented. LEGAL AID - DOES IT WORK? 
DO WOMEN HAVE ACCESS? YOU and I are persuaded to believe that there is such a 
thing as "legal aid" for people who have no money for justice. Is there? It appears 
that a woman whose spouse works, even when no economic relationship exists in 
the marriage (that just means she has her money and her husband his and the twain 
do not mix much if at all) has no access to legal aid because her husband works.

In a no economic relationship marriage even if her husband was a billionaire she 
would have no access to justice and law because she could not afford it but there 
are no real provisions in law to appreciate these situations which are not that 
unsual among certain cultural groups (Islam for example) and among people who 
have been brought up in a no economic relationship marriages. Our Evaluation Method 
and An Open Invitation and Our Plan Cases presented herein are either carefully 
researched or accepted on the basis of credibility and become input to our Fehler! 
Textmarke nicht definiert. which then presents a finding of either 'accept' or 
'reject'. Our Artificial Intelligence is capable of 10-1000 times human mental 
capacity. If you have a case that has never met JUSTICE from "an intelligent society's" 
point of view, why not drop us a line?